Can Čović "sit" in two countries

Bosnia and Herzegovina is a miracle of legal gymnastics. You will see things there that you won't see anywhere else. We constantly overlook certain anomalies in this society as if they don't exist.

One of them is certainly the fact that the president of the Presidency of one country votes for the legislative body of another country. However, regardless of the legal and moral dilemma surrounding this situation, it must be admitted that the gentleman leader is consistent in fulfilling his civic duties and patriotic obligations in all countries where he has the right to vote.

Therefore, according to Mr. Dragan Čović's logic, Croatian identity can only be recognized for those people who are of Catholic faith and who are politically united and profiled within the HDZ ranks.

Real and Unreal Croats

What are we talking about here? God gave us reason and memory, and modern technology allows historical moments to be recorded and documented in detail. The respected and above all esteemed Mr. Čović, who is, incidentally, a doctor of science, has been pointing out the SDP's Trojan horse for eight years, Željko Komšić, who is not a "real" Croat and as such cannot represent Croats in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Now we come to how Mr. Dragan Čović is consistent – he has taken on the cross of a righteous struggle to oust all "wrong" Croats from the political scene and position the "real" ones. When the opportunity arose, he also dealt with Zoran Milanović, the Croatian Željko Komšić.

In the end, Milanović is also not a "real" Croat, because if he were, he would be in the HDZ like "all honest Croats." Does Dragan Čović have a problem with renegades from the holy party or with social democracy in general? It is also incomprehensible to me that someone is a Croat and not an HDZ pioneer or at least some kind of lieutenant in the structures of this exceptionally enlightened party.

Although I appreciate the political consistency of the first among Croats in Bosnia and Herzegovina, I still cannot fathom why I said at the beginning of this text that there is a legal and moral dilemma surrounding this situation.

I wonder if it is moral for people who do not live in the territory of the Republic of Croatia to decide on the lives and living conditions of those who live there? It is not moral for this to happen, because it is a fact that the "holy party" received only three more mandates than the "wrong" Croats. Which, again, shows that there are many more "wrong" than "real" Croats in the territory of the Republic of Croatia, and that the latter mostly live in other countries.

It seems that the burden of all Balkan countries is that their diaspora is righteous, while those who live in them are fools and ignoramuses. I want to believe that Tomislav Karamarko will dispel this dilemma of mine, using the racial hypotheses of the late Professor Šime Đodan about "real" Croats who have square heads, and then take a caliper and sort the real from the unreal in two moves.

Criminal Offense

My dilemma also has a legal side, but related to Mr. Čović, as I do not want to delve into constitutional law and the issue of a state's sovereignty. The following is incomprehensible to me: How is it possible that a legal situation that constitutes a criminal offense has not been characterized as such.

It is undisputed that Mr. Čović has dual citizenship – of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republic of Croatia, because if it were not so, he would either not be able to be the president of the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina, or he would not be able to vote in the parliamentary elections in the Republic of Croatia. But why is this a criminal offense?

To clarify: As the president of the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Čović has access to documents and information that could be related to the Republic of Croatia and its citizens, especially information obtained through secret methods by the Intelligence-Security Agency, which could be considered a criminal offense in the Republic of Croatia.

If Mr. Čović does not report the existence of a criminal offense to the competent authorities in the Republic of Croatia, he himself commits one, because there is a civic obligation to report criminal offenses. However, if Mr. Čović decides to report such a criminal offense, he commits another criminal offense under the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina – "disclosure of official secrets."

From a legal perspective, I wonder how Mr. Čović and those in similar positions are not in prison?

I pose this question to the Chief Prosecutor of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the President of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina.