How is it possible that the RS law on the rights of torture victims defines the Omarska camp as a 'collection centre'

(Patria) - The Association of Victims and Witnesses of Genocide reacted to the statements of Željka Cvijanović, president of the RS entity, in an interview for the Israeli Haaretz in which she, among other things, stated that "the Serbian side does not deny genocide and is open to any solution agreed upon by partners in BiH."

- We remind the president of the RS entity that the Serbian side has never been in favour of any solution or any agreement at the BiH level that would ban or prevent the denial of genocide, the Holocaust, and other war crimes.

Initiatives have existed since 2007 from representatives of the FBiH, but representatives from the RS did not even allow a discussion on the topic, let alone the adoption of a law.

Also, when the president speaks about victims, i.e., that a victim is a victim and that they must be treated equally, how is it possible that the RS entity law on the rights of torture victims defines the Omarska camp as a "collection centre", despite the fact that all verdicts refer to it as a classic camp where the greatest atrocities were committed against the non-Serb population of the Prijedor region, while on the other hand, places of detention where Serbs suffered are characterised as camps even though there is not a single verdict confirming this.

Is this the dialogue proposed by the president of the RS entity? One would rather say it is a case of Ćosić's false patriotism - the statement highlights.