Dodik wants to provoke his own dismissal, so he can play the victim among Serbs

After triggering a new wave of crisis in Bosnia and Herzegovina by passing a Decision in the National Assembly of the BiH entity Republika Srpska to call a referendum on the Court and Prosecutor's Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Milorad Dodik continues with political and public violence and threatens again, this time from Belgrade, warned the Party for Bosnia and Herzegovina (SBiH), in a statement signed by party president Amer Jerlagić, as reported by the news agency Patria.

From this party, they draw attention to the fact that pressured by the firm stances of the international community as well as the economic catastrophe in the part of Bosnia and Herzegovina he personally controls through the government, Dodik went to seek advice in the capital of Serbia from the Serbian Prime Minister Aleksandar Vučić.

Although it was expected, SBiH believes, that Dodik would soften his stance and change the Decision on the referendum, Dodik is issuing an ultimatum to Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Court and Prosecutor's Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and the international community, particularly blaming America and Great Britain for the current situation in BiH.

- The nervousness is more than obvious. Such behavior can be defined in no other way than as a conscious provocation of his own dismissal by the High Representative, in order to provoke the status of a victim or some kind of ethnic hero among the people, and thus justify the inevitable economic catastrophe, for which Dodik is personally responsible and for which he has no solution – state from SBiH.

Instead of threatening and setting conditions, the most radical dictator on European soil should deal with the human rights of returnees who survived the genocidal campaigns of the Army and Police of Republika Srpska. Dodik should order an investigation and punishment of those who carved a cross with four S's into the returnee Nerka Hanifić with a knife – sharply react from SBiH.

- Dodik and Vučić should also be clear that Serbia is not a guarantor of the Dayton Agreement, as they often like to point out, but Serbia's signature on the Dayton Agreement is a confirmation of participation in the aggression against BiH, not a guarantee, so as a party to the conflict it was quite logical that it had to be a signatory to the peace agreement – the statement reads.

From SBiH, they state that it is very important that domestic elected officials in the most responsible positions in BiH do not accept any ultimatums and do not fall for the Greater Serbian tactical traps, but firmly defend the integrity of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the sovereignty of its state institutions. They also appeal to the international community, primarily the United States and Great Britain, not to give in to the false pressures and ultimatums of Milorad Dodik.