
By: Rasim Belko @rasimbelko
If we look at who the spin doctors and promoters of the "Trojka" project are and what they are like, we can be happy without any cynicism that the state of Bosnia and Herzegovina has not collapsed since that project came to power. Or rather, it hasn't collapsed yet, and it's fortunate that we have survived half of their mandate, so I hope that in the remaining half they will not be like their mentors.
One of the loudest and most media-represented promoters of the political scourge that has significantly set back our society and state was Professor Enver Kazaz. In 2022, the year of the general elections, Kazaz was running from studio to studio, appearing on front pages, and repeating the mantra that SDA is a scourge and that citizens of BiH must vote for those they are sure will bring them a better life.
In his "analyses," Kazaz left no room for doubt about whom he meant, as in his observations, only one side was a scourge, and the other was the bearer of hope. In his media campaigns for the benefit of the "Trojka" project, Kazaz did not spare the Islamic Community or the Reis-ul-ulema Husein ef. Kavazović, whom he called militant instruments of the SDA and a savage community whose role from the nineties has not been clarified.
This propaganda stooge of "Trojka" also defended Schmidt's amendments to the Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, telling us:
"I have read the entire decision, so I say that Mr. Schmidt was right. Namely, if we know that we had a government in a technical mandate, a government with respirators, a government that couldn't deal with covid, a government that couldn't procure vaccines, a government that exposed us to the dangers of the energy crisis, food crisis, demographic crisis, etc., then it is very clear that Mr. Schmidt unblocked the process of forming the government after the elections."
Today, knowing that Kazaz did all this out of personal interest and that he was "arranged" in accordance with his contribution to the "Trojka" project, it is clear that his credibility is burned to irrelevance. The professor sold himself like an alcoholic sells himself for a beer.
Therefore, no one serious takes his ramblings seriously anymore, unless they are directly aimed at undermining the state and its future. And it is precisely from the studio of the public service of Sarajevo Canton (TVSA), on whose Supervisory Board he sits and whose director he supports in mobbing employees and desecrating the program, that Kazaz fired the UZP-like definition of a civic state:
"First, we need to break the myth about this so-called civic state, what it means and what it entails in complex state communities like Bosnia and Herzegovina? (...) If we continue to trumpet about a civic state, then I must agree with those who claim that it is a unitary state, and I must say that Slobodan Milošević wanted such a state. That's the recipe. Milošević advocated for the principle of one person, one vote in a complex national federation with dominant Greater Serbian nationalism," Kazaz stated from the TVSA screen.
And again, he left no room for doubt as to why the "Trojka" project allowed Dragan Čović and Milorad Dodik to dismantle Bosnia and Herzegovina from the ground up according to instructions from Zagreb and Belgrade. Given their mentors and agitprop, it's no wonder.
In a few sentences, Kazaz managed to utter at least three seriously grave lies from the vocabulary commonly used by Čović, Dodik, Plenković, Vučić, and their lie doctors. Whether Kazaz works for this hegemonic mechanism, I don't know, but that he serves it well is very obvious.
Kazaz's first lie is that Bosnia and Herzegovina is a "state community." This lie from the vocabulary of Greater Serbian propaganda creators was once adopted by Christian Schmidt, HDZ leaders, and was also spread by the "Naši" like Sabina Ćudić and Mirsad Čamdžić.
The entities in Bosnia and Herzegovina are administrative arrangements, not states that would form Kazaz's imagined "state community." At the same time, the decision of the Constitutional Court on the appeal of Denis Bećirović, which abolishes the term "joint institutions" and emphasizes that these are exclusively "institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina," clearly indicates that Bosnia and Herzegovina is a sovereign and integral state.
Kazaz's second lie is that Bosnia and Herzegovina is a "complex national federation." Kazaz copied this phrase, either on orders or voluntarily, from Croatian interpreters of Bosnia and Herzegovina's structure, because in the neighboring country, even some universities define the mode of organization completely falsely. Bosnia and Herzegovina does not contain federal units within itself, but entities which, unlike most federal units in federal states/federations, have much less autonomy and, according to the BiH Constitution, have no right to secession.
And after the lies, the "Trojka" mentor Kazaz delivered a seriously dangerous spin, claiming that a "civic state" is a model advocated by war criminal and dictator Slobodan Milošević. It is difficult to expect that Kazaz, as someone who has been present in public life in Bosnia and Herzegovina for a long time, does not understand that a civic state – whether it is Bosnia and Herzegovina, Germany, France... – is actually a state where the rule of law prevails, and every citizen enjoys the full scope of guaranteed rights regardless of religion, nationality, race, place of residence...
It is clear, therefore, that on the eve of the final verdict in the case of "Kovačević vs. BiH," mentor Kazaz, like his "Trojka" disciples, is working in favor of HDZ, Zagreb, and Čović. Because the third lie is that Milošević wanted a civic Yugoslavia in which the majority Serbian people would be dominant, as it has been proven beyond any doubt that Milošević wanted a Greater Serbia, ethnically pure. This has been confirmed by the Hague verdicts against all executors of his plans.
Just as the previous final decisions of the European Court of Human Rights have confirmed that Bosnia and Herzegovina lacks the rule of law and have shown that only a civically organized Bosnia and Herzegovina can guarantee these rights.
There is no doubt that Kazaz's attack on the civic organization of Bosnia and Herzegovina was aimed at sending another message to the European Court of Human Rights that our country "does not need a civic organization," because "it would represent the dominance of Bosniaks that Milošević wanted for Serbs."
The only good thing about all of this is the fact that the "Trojka's" employed ideologue lost his credibility long ago, just as the spin propaganda that "Trojka" is the hope for Bosnia and Herzegovina has faded. We need to endure a little longer, and then we will have the opportunity to send both the mentor and the students to the dustbin of history and begin to repair the damage they have inevitably left behind.
Komentari (0)
Prijavite se za komentiranje
PrijavaJos nema komentara. Budite prvi!
Minuta
Sve →Iz drugih kategorija

High Representative Not Elected: Germans, French and British Sabotaged Americans, New Attempt at End of June

ČOVIĆ WITHOUT MERCY: How Those Who Brought Ademović to Office Created a Political Hell for Him




Sunny Saturday, quite warm




Tragedy in Albanian resort: Two minors drown













