President of Sarajevo AfD in decline: even psychological manipulation techniques don't help Sabina Ćudić!

The president of "Our Party", and no one knows why or how, because Sabina Ćudić has long since proven herself in the political swamp of Bosnia and Herzegovina as a political debater without a political idea or substance, dangerous only in the narrative, the socio-political one that in her imagined world is a debate without consequences.

If you transcribed several of her speeches and read them, you would see how much manipulation there is in total, because the content would reveal no political value.

Engaging in politics also means producing consequences, not only for oneself and one's party, but also for society as a whole. The debater Sabina Ćudić cannot process this, and in combination with an ego as high as Mount Maglić and learned manipulation techniques, she tries to present it as a sacrifice for our cause.

Not only did Sabina Ćudić not remorsefully retract the SANU-like message about the war in BiH, i.e., the siege of Sarajevo as a struggle for power, with an apology to the public, but quite the opposite, relying on debating skills and learned psychological tactics of manipulation, she tried to show that she is right, and everyone against her—from judges and courts that delivered verdicts on the character of the war in BiH, through researchers of those verdicts and the war itself, to the media, politicians, and the public—are wrong.

Every war is a struggle for power, and that is the only correct thing in her argument, but the war in BiH was qualified in the verdicts of the International Hague Tribunal as a double aggression that produced a double joint criminal enterprise and genocide.

"The Trial Chamber concluded that there was a joint criminal enterprise and that its common criminal purpose was the forcible and permanent removal of the majority of non-Serbs from large parts of Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina through the commission of murders, deportation, and persecution," states part of the verdict of the Appeals Chamber of the International Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals in the case against Jovica Stanišić and Franko Simatović, former heads of the State Security of Serbia.

Thus, the participation of the top officials of the Serbian state security in the joint criminal enterprise quite clearly defines the war in BiH as aggression, and the criminal goal of ethnic cleansing of all non-Serbs defines the war also as a struggle against another ethnicity and religion in order to create a large, homogeneous Serb state.

However, Sabina does not read or think about the war; she, like her entire party, is disgusted by the facts and the story of the war victims, because the political code in that party is such that they consider themselves aliens in Sarajevo, while they live comfortably on the votes of the victims of aggression and systematic crimes.

The problem, therefore, lies in the code, and that is why we have an obligation to view that political party together with its president as the orange Sarajevo AfD and eliminate it from political life in the elections.

And now let's return to yesterday's appearance by Sabina on FTV. First of all, Sabina attacked the non-Bosniak war hero and Golden Lily recipient Željko Komšić in order to try, to the maximum extent, to drown out the effect of her own drivel with her cacophony. In addition, psychological methods were supposed to serve her to appear as a victim, and if you look at the various ways in which NS cadres justify themselves after mistakes, crimes, and accusations, you will see the same, learned or trained psychological method.

"Željko Komšić should have defended me too," Sabina blurted out on air, forgetting that Komšić and all members of the ARBiH did defend her and everyone else who lived in the area under siege or aggression. The distress caused by the fact that a member of the Presidency, who in one election received as many votes as NS in the previous five election cycles, did not come to argue with her about her interpretation of the aggression, triggered Sabina's first attempt at manipulation.

With every subsequent situation she spoke about or question she was asked, she expanded the DARVO tactic. DARVO tactic, in its simplest form, is when a manipulative person defends themselves by denying guilt, then attacking those who confront them with the truth, and finally reversing roles to appear as the victim.

Watch the Plenum from June 3 on FTV and you will clearly see it. First, by attacking Komšić and critics, she tried to deny what was said. Then she positioned herself against the entire public, including experts, adding to that the fabricated support of various categories, but each time no name. In doing so, she invoked that she too was a child in the war, that she was in Srebrenica, that she spoke about it in the Council of Europe, and similar things.

And finally, she is the victim of persecution who tells us that she will "fight so that everyone has the right to freedom to say what they want," and for this purpose, the whiteness of her attire and feigned gentleness were supposed to serve. Sabina could not defend herself from the question of who exactly has their freedom of speech banned, but it seemed that the hostess had neither the will nor the strength to compromise herself with the nonsense of the AfD president.

And then Gaslighting. Again, psychological manipulation of the public. And in a form where the manipulator Sabina emotionally abuses the public, creating false narratives and distorting reality. The goal of this tactic is to make the public doubt their own memory, common sense, or judgment.

Since I did not watch the show live, I was surprised by the message "how Our Party voted on the Southern Gas Interconnection." Because Sabina tried, using the Gaslighting tactic, to confuse the public and tell a story about how she is against the Southern Interconnection. But the reality is that Our Party supported that project and asked its tutors if anything else was needed.

This is how Sabina spoke after the meeting at the US Embassy, to which the Sarajevo tricolors ran at a sprint: "What we received are guarantees that any attempts at political profiteering from something that should be mutual economic benefit for the US and BiH will not be tolerated in any way, and that this project should remain in the sphere of economics, not politics."

However, the manipulator forgot that there are written traces of her earlier actions, and in the show she says that she wrote to Mr. Bakir Izetbegović to protect the state from the Southern Interconnection project. This is a dangerous psychological manipulator who tries to shift the blame onto the opposition, imagining a struggle for the state and the enemy of the state in the opposition, rather than in the bloc she belongs to, which has brought the state to the brink of collapse.

And no matter how trained she is in using psychological tricks, propaganda effects, and debating skills, Sabina Ćudić and her AfD are irreversibly heading toward political extinction. Because, regardless of their training, their biggest problem is the failure to understand the fact and the time they live in, i.e., the existence of evidence in their own actions against themselves.