ELMEDIN AGAINST INTERNATIONAL RULING On HRT show, Konaković avoided answering whether Croatia was an aggressor on BiH

SARAJEVO, (Patria) - Elmedin Konaković, Minister of Foreign Affairs of BiH and president of the People and Justice party, visited Zagreb again today, but did not distinguish himself this time either.

After a recent diplomatic visit to Croatia, after which he had to justify that he did not invite Croatia and give it permission to interfere in the internal affairs of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Konaković was a guest on the show Nedjeljom u 2 on HRT today and did not dare to answer the question of whether Croatia committed aggression against Bosnia and Herzegovina in accordance with the rulings of the International Court.

"Those are the topics, now the interpretation of legal experts by which in that ruling of the Six for a joint criminal enterprise, a definition can be read which states that it is the project of Banovina in which Tuđman lived and that he was precisely the one. And whether he was the one through people from Bosnia and Herzegovina or whether the participation was formal, those are the topics that would explode here today, and I will be a diplomat and keep that answer to myself," Konaković answered the question posed.

"I will be a diplomat and I will not answer the question of whether Croatia committed aggression against Bosnia and Herzegovina," said the Minister of Foreign Affairs of BiH @DinoKonakovic as a guest on HRT pic.twitter.com/sMt6jGIvOl

— Istraga.ba (@IstragaB) March 19, 2023

And so Konaković moved to the side of those who minimize and ultimately deny Croatia's aggression against Bosnia and Herzegovina. All in order to avoid Dragan Čović's anger.

In the same way as Croatian politicians and professors do, not disputing the verdict, but disputing Croatia's participation.

The text by Petar Vidov on Faktograf from 2017 is the best description of what Konaković is silent about for the sake of personal political interests: "The fact, undoubtedly established at the Hague Tribunal, that crimes were committed under the patronage of Franjo Tuđman, in order to fulfill his megalomaniacal idea of creating a 'Greater Croatia', i.e., establishing a modern Croatian republic within the borders of Banovina Croatia from 1939, is being disputed. For the same reason, the factually documented statement of the court that an international conflict was waged on the territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina between 1992 and 1994, or that Croatia was an aggressor during the war in BiH in the relevant period, is also being questioned."

Political currents of subservience have clearly grown in Sarajevo, which, for a piece of power, are so bold as to go against facts proven in an international court.

In this case too, there is no need to call Konaković or someone from Croatia; it is clear that the head of BiH diplomacy is in a subordinate relationship to Zagreb.