The UZP in the pocket of Comrade Red!

I don't know on whose behalf and for whose account Boris Brezo and Enver Kazaz are working, but it's not hard to figure out from their conversation the other day. It all happened in the podcast of the aforementioned journalist, who didn't like much in Sarajevo, and a professor who likes to repeatedly recycle his own propaganda. What is certain is that they are not working in the interest of the majority public, citizens, the state, or an objective assessment of facts.

I won't write about Brezo, but I will say that it is inappropriate to interrupt the interlocutor, to be more Kazaz than Kazaz, and for that journalist to speak of Komšić and Miletić as sacred cows of Sarajevo to enhance the impression.

What Enver Kazaz belongs to and what motivates him is not unknown to the public in Sarajevo, nor to the public in Bosnia and Herzegovina. We know him as an agitprop who, in the role of a professor of language and literature, pushed the "Trojka" political project before the 2022 elections, and then justified the imposition of that project on power, even though they were miles away from the election winners.

Even then, the Constitution and the Election Law were irrelevant to Kazaz, because he was defending Schmidt, who was forcibly changing the political landscape in the interest of the HDZ.

Kazaz has practically not stopped being an agitprop for difficult, but well-paid ideas. After "Trojka", he advocated for solutions tailored to Dragan Čović, which led him to the position of ending up having coffee with Dragan Čović as an irrelevant factor in the political and public life of BiH.

Today, he is once again an agitprop for the anti-European and anti-state narrative that he promotes in an effort to undermine the standards that are sought for BiH based on what the European Union defines.

If we look at his sphere of influence, Kazaz is an ordinary trumpet, but as such, he is enough to muddy the clear waters of Bosnian and Euro-Atlantic fields in various media-friendly forms.

However, one trend follows Kazaz, and increasingly the Social Democratic Party, which has not yet distanced itself from the messages of their agitprop, so we can consider their silence as approval. What SDP's figurehead Denis Bećirović thinks about it is up to him to say, but it is evident that the red BiH socialism has veered off into the Ustaše UZP right.

Namely, in a conversation with Brezo, and in an attempt to damage Željko Komšić, a member of the Presidency and leader of the Democratic Front, Kazaz says: “If you, as a member of the Presidency from the Croatian people, use the capital of one of the armies that participated in the war in BiH (Army of RBiH), which is a combination of aggression and civil war, let's be clear, you are automatically siding with one side. You can call yourself Milorad or Dragan, but if your slogans stem from that kind and if you express them very aggressively in the public space, then you are ideologically, in fact, a Bosniak nationalist.”

The fact that a literature professor in the twilight of his career, which has been prolonged, is trying to define the character of the war, the character of Komšić, and invent some nationalism, sufficiently explains who Kazaz is, let alone what and for whose account he is speaking.

However, it is only fair to remind this greedy Jew that international judgments of the Hague Tribunal have defined the character of the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The fact that he is trying to obscure the facts is dangerous for only one reason, because the media that promote secessionism and the narrative of civil war will use him as a Bosniak (by name) professor, who "tells the truth as someone from Sarajevo".

By obscuring the truth in the interest of political lies, Kazaz is finally revealing himself and thus entering the role of Dževad Galijašević. Kazaz knows who attacked this country and when, he knows very well which neighboring armies entered the territory of RBiH, but it is not important to him, because he is protecting his right to an interest-based coffee with Čović.

The fact that Željko Komšić is popular among the people as a Golden Lily of the Army of RBiH bothers Kazaz because he is part of that Sarajevo FGR mass that calls the defenders of Bosnia and Herzegovina a rural mass.

But what are facts compared to greed. And greed has exposed the false social democrat, leading him to the bottom from which he tells us that members of the BiH Presidency should be elected by some electors through whom Dragan Čović would have control over the only institution that he has not controlled in the FBiH continuously since the Washington Agreement until today. However, given that Kazaz is an agitprop and very close to the SDP, the public question for the SDP leadership is whether this is also their position. I especially ask them if they also believe that the war in BiH had a combined character of civil war and aggression. Moreover, Kazaz anti-constitutionally uses the term county, which is a consequence of the fact that he last updated his knowledge in the last century.

In essence, the key reason why Kazaz is bothered by the policies of Komšić, Zlatko Miletić, and Slaven Kovačević is the task he received to attack the dam that, by advocating for the concept of a civic organization of the state, hinders the combination of constitutional changes tailored to Zagreb and Dragan Čović.

That is why Komšić and Miletić are militant to him, because Kazaz's task is obviously to send messages from Sarajevo that will be the ace up the sleeve for Zagreb and their branch in Mostar.

Interestingly, in his rush to spread deceptions, unhindered by Boris Brezo, Kazaz repeats the messages of NiP leader Elmedin Konaković regarding Slaven Kovačević's appeal to the Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. Thus, Kazaz tells us that "Kovačević has disgraced BiH" and also that he "has no credibility", because Kazaz, of course, reads Večernji and other Herzegovina media, and believes them implicitly.

If Brezo had been a host according to the rules of the profession, he would have asked Kazaz what he meant by that message about Kovačević, and he would have realized that his interlocutor has no idea about the appeal or Kovačević's commitment, just as he has no idea what a civic state is or what the judgments about the aggression of Serbia and Croatia against BiH mean, but he mantras, because his path to realizing his interests lies in mantras.

If Kazaz had gotten to the essence, he would have fallen into the pit of his own ignorance, because while he was reading Krleža, someone was writing, studying, and appealing that every person is worth the same. But, here this literature professor would decide on the character of Kovačević and his appeal.

And let there be no doubt, this is not a defense of Kovačević, because it is easy to defend oneself from Kazaz, but a message that Kazaz must also understand the price of playing for anti-state teams. Every time he enters the public space under the red flag of Ustašism, we will come out to answer him. Because, if Kazaz is given public space without a response, Dževad Galijašević will be pushed into the background.

Kazaz is not politically dangerous to the cadres he targets, on the contrary, but he is dangerous because he muddies the narrative and speaks from Sarajevo, from the position of a professor and analyst. And when a Sarajevo professor says that "Bosnia and Herzegovina is a consociational democracy", and Croatian media add that he is a Bosniak because his name is Enver, then that is a problem.

The problem is due to the fact that the Croatian public will much more easily manipulate and send messages to the international community from Kazaz, Elmedin Konaković, and others who have publicly supported Dragan Čović's narrative about the legitimate election of members of the Presidency.

And the biggest concern about all of this is the situation where even SDP members, the rest of "Trojka", have not fully declared themselves, advocating for the support of HDZ BiH candidate Darijana Filipović.

All of this comes after three years in which "Trojka" has been the political apprentice of the HDZ. That is why the SDP leadership must come out and publicly state whether their election program is a fight against a civic state, advocating for legitimacy and consociation.

Let's return to the ignorance and complete chaos in Enver Kazaz's head, who says about the HDZ candidate Filipović: "A decent lady, but an instrument in the hands of Dragan Čović."

And then he adds: "I wouldn't be surprised if citizens of civic orientation refuse to vote for both Bećirović and Izetbegović and Kovačević, and vote for Ms. Filipović, in order to harm this kind of politics."

Realistically, what can you say to him when he can't even grasp the abyss he has jumped into. But, it sounds something like this - Sarajevo fans, because of a bad coach, midfielders, and strikers, will go to Mostar to cheer for Zrinjski. Maybe, but on some heavy drugs!