O’Brien sees Serbia as a guarantor of regional security, while Vučić stockpiles weapons - We know who his target is, the question is do we see it?

Written by: Rasim Belko

– I believe that in cooperation with numerous businessmen, we will be able to showcase a large number of suicide drones or kamikaze drones by the end of the year. Everything will be domestically produced and this will represent a great advantage for Serbia compared to its surroundings. Serbia is a serious country with a serious army, we are preparing to preserve our country, because in current conditions, if you do not have a sufficiently strong army, you will not have a country or a state.

This is the message from the President of Serbia, Aleksandar Vučić, sent from Topčider to his neighbors, primarily to Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo as the targeted area of an expanded Serbia, that is, the Serbian world.

At the barracks in Topčider, part of the arsenal of the Serbian Army was displayed, and Vučić, with the presence of the executor of secessionism in BiH, Milorad Dodik, clearly emphasized that Serbia will continue to arm itself. And with offensive weaponry. That is, weaponry used for attack and conquest of territory, not as Vučić tries to present it for the defense of Serbia, because both Vučić and the entire region know that no one in the neighborhood intends to attack Serbia.

But since coming to power, Vučić has been continuously attacking on multiple fronts. Politically, through his tentacles, he has conquered Montenegro and achieved a strategic advantage in the realization of the Serbian world project. The arming of the Serbian Army is carried out continuously, thus clearly letting everyone know that, in line with Dodik's statement, he is waiting for a favorable moment to realize the project.

But neither Bosnia nor Kosovo would be so frightened by Serbia's military power, because Serbia was powerful in the 1990s as well, yet it failed to realize its plans. They should be more frightened by the continuous policy that sees Serbia as a protector of peace in the Western Balkans, and above all, as a bearer of regional economic cooperation.

It is therefore ambiguous that from the West, Bosnia and Kosovo are told that they are strictly committed to preserving their sovereignty and territorial integrity, while at the same time leaving them to the currents controlled by Belgrade.

During her visit to Sarajevo, the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, presented a program of economic growth, which local commentators and analysts have excellently recognized as a repackaged Open Balkan. Because this program implies economic integration of Western Balkan countries that are not in the EU, and we do not need to guess who has primacy among these countries.

At the same time, during a briefing for journalists of the European department of the State Department, the Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs, Ambassador James O'Brien, supports von der Leyen's program, but also says:

“And I think we will expect that these parliamentary groups will work together to deliver what is needed for the citizens of Serbia and, frankly, for regional stability, and that is the focus we will have as we move forward. I think we do not want to miss how the constellation of political forces provides a very clear way to see how Serbia is progressing and who is responsible for it. And I think that is a welcome thing for the people of Serbia and for all of us.”

Although he doubts the integrity in Serbia, O'Brien, who is coming to BiH in a few days, nevertheless puts the focus on cooperation between the USA and Serbia for the sake of REGIONAL STABILITY!

And all of us who live in Serbia's neighborhood have known for 30 years how Serbia preserves stability. This is also clear to O'Brien, who wrote the Dayton Agreement in the days after the genocide and the joint criminal enterprise in which members of the top leadership of the Security Service (today BIA), as well as the Army and Police of Serbia, participated.

In such a development of the situation, Bosnia and Kosovo have no choice but to primarily try to prepare themselves to protect the population. Because they must not allow the “guardians of regional stability” to once again slaughter unprotected children, women, and the elderly. Likewise, Bosnia in particular must change directions in developing its defensive power, because if it is not ready to respond to Vučić's kamikazes, Lazars, Miloshes, and whatever else, it is not impossible that it will be split in two, and this or some other O'Brien will conclude in the State Department or Congress that this is good for regional security.

Because O'Brien, the man who arrives in Sarajevo on February 1st, wrote the Dayton Agreement from which the secessionism of the RS and the HZHB was born, parallel connections through which Bosnia is being taken away in favor of Serbia, and all similar adversities we have been exposed to from then until today.

Therefore, we have no right to be naive and believe that this same O'Brien will not one day write an agreement according to which, conditionally speaking, Bosnia belongs to Serbia, and Herzegovina to Croatia. After all, he wrote that Srebrenica belongs to the RS, whose army ethnically cleansed Srebrenica and the Podrinje region through genocide.

And Vučić is not arming himself for a photo op; one day, when he has stockpiled enough weapons and enough trained professional and reserve soldiers, he will have no dilemma about moving primarily on Bosnia. Because a man who is ready to come out of the fridge for the sake of a political campaign is sufficiently indoctrinated with psychology and Svetosavlje to wage war, just like his former idol!