Ordered Trojka propaganda about Kovačević in HDZ's campaign and the role of Denis Bećirović?

By: Rasim Belko

"The first to reveal its cards was the Front of the Bosniak Warrior, the so-called democratic one, which (almost) got ahead of itself and promoted Slaven Kovačević as a candidate for the Croatian seat in Sarajevo, usurped for years, at Titina 16 – (legal) advisor to Ljiljan Zlatni. Known, otherwise, for once being a Croat, then repented, once a Serb, then gave up, and finally realized (...)", thus writes Josip Vričko in the introduction to his column for Katolički tjednik, published at the end of January this year.

Some might wonder where the secular state is if religious newspapers engage in politics, but that only applies when the Islamic Community and its leader interfere in political currents. This clearly does not apply to the Catholic or Orthodox religious communities.

But that is for another analysis. What Vričko wrote in the introduction to his column defines the only serious success of the political project Trojka (SDP, NiP, NS) in the current mandate. And the success lies in the battle won against the civic state. Because, if it weren't for the Trojka project and the satellites that follow them, there would be little chance of us seeing an emboldened Dodik and Čović today, walking the world and their homeland with the intention of dividing our country. If it weren't for Trojka, Bosnia and Herzegovina and those who love it would today have a verdict that would pave the way for civic equality, a path to an ordered, unitary state, or if you will, a path to a state that has institutions and the strength to defend itself from threats, whether internal or external.

Trojka has postponed that story for a while, until some new Slaven Kovačević, by openly siding with the followers of UZP policy. Denis Bećirović himself, who falsely swears by democracy, also undermined that story along with his electoral political staff, but he did nothing, not even something significant, but absolutely nothing, for at least his party to remain on its former course of action and at least abstain from undermining such an important verdict.

From the entire struggle of Trojka, and even Bećirović, against civic Bosnia and Herzegovina, the current campaign, simultaneously conducted by the media hawks of UZP policy and HDZ with their followers, has emerged.

It is hypocritical that Bećirović tried to protect himself from the whole story with messages like: "Neighboring countries, some international officials, as well as domestic politicians, exerted undue political pressure on the ECtHR." This same Bećirović is photographed these days with most of those domestic politicians who helped deceive the ECtHR and undermine the verdict itself.

And do you remember Trojka's campaign that "Kovačević doesn't know what he is, that he is a little Croat, a little Serb, a little Other... and that he disgraced BiH before the ECtHR"? Of course, you remember, it was loud and unequivocally in the interest of Croatian politics.

Thus, today we have the narrative of those for whom Kovačević is the last obstacle to breaking up the state of Bosnia and Herzegovina, a narrative that was previously established and spread in the public space by Sarajevo's Trojka along with their figurehead in the BiH Presidency.

The fact is that HDZ hawks today write less about legitimate and illegitimate, and focus precisely on the story of Kovačević's ethnic identity, not even trying to consider the fact that Croatia itself proved in the proceedings before the ECtHR that Slaven Kovačević is ethnically a Croat.

If we are to be a little sarcastic, Kovačević is today the only legitimate Croat in the race for the BiH Presidency, because others do not have a court-proven identity as Croats. A joke, but not far from the truth.

However, let's return to Trojka, from which, in the interest of pro-UZP policies, they condemned Kovačević's candidacy for a member of the Presidency, aware that Kovačević is the only one who can stop their boss Čović in his intention to occupy the last strategic position. And not only do they undermine Kovačević through regime media, but they have harnessed an army of bots for the whole story.

And once, elements from that Trojka were with Kovačević, trying to gain a political point from his application. Thus, at one time, after the initial verdict in favor of Kovačević, Sabina Ćudić claimed that she also played a role in everything, meaning she helped the verdict be in Kovačević's favor. When it turned out that she was lying, that is, when she could have helped through institutions and political means, she didn't even speak up, so as not to anger Čović.

Therefore, it is clear that Trojka's story, along with their member of the Presidency Bećirović, boils down to everything anti-Bosnian. They don't mind Kovačević politically, but strategically, because they know well what Čović has planned and are trying to impose a public and political discourse accordingly!