Is it time to cut off Schmidt and Murphy: Their statements are the problem, not missiles and fighter jets violating Dayton!

By: Rasim Belko @rasimbelko

The OHR and the US Embassy will react swiftly when Džafer Alić, president of the Herzegovina-Neretva Canton Assembly, says that Bosniaks are owners in Bosnia and Herzegovina, while other peoples living in BiH are unwelcome tenants. Even faster will react that OHR, but also embassies led by the American one, when Bakir Izetbegović says that we have counted ourselves, that we know how many of us there are. And according to the OHR and Western embassies, this represents a threat to Dayton, stability, and who knows what else.

So, when Bosniaks say we will not allow ourselves to be slaughtered again, when they raise their heads, here come the OHR and the US Embassy to lecture them. To the very same Bosniaks whom they nullified in order to deliver the Federation to Croatian politics, and Bosnia and Herzegovina to the Serb-Croatian entity. The US Embassy and the OHR see a threat in the fact that Bosniaks will no longer agree to be slaughtered, but they do not see a threat in the fact that two neighboring countries, convicted of aggression against Bosnia and Herzegovina, are arming themselves with identical political goals.

The Dayton Agreement, specifically one annex, limits the armament of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Croatia. This is Annex 1B, which defines the permissible limits in five categories for the aforementioned three countries: "The categories of armament limited by the Agreement subject to reduction are main battle tanks, armored combat vehicles, artillery pieces, combat aircraft, and assault helicopters".

It has long been clear to everyone following regional armament trends that the Agreement has been violated. Croatia has bought fighter jets, is buying French missile systems. Serbia is also arming itself with fighter jets, but not Russian ones, but from NATO member France. Serbia is also buying missile systems. Specifically, it bought one from China, and is negotiating for another with NATO member Hungary.

Instead of focusing on creating pressure on Bosniaks, international actors should direct their efforts towards ensuring that everyone in the region adheres to international agreements and does not violate provisions that could jeopardize long-term peace. If serious measures are not taken against the violations of Annex 1B, it could potentially lead to new conflicts and destabilization that could have catastrophic consequences for all peoples in BiH.

Or is it all actually part of a larger plan. The warning we issued from these pages a year ago has passed rather lightly in the public. It is about the Project 2030 and the planned partition of Bosnia. At that time, I published parts of an article from the weekly "The Spectator", when maritime law lawyer Andrew Tettenborn writes that Bosnia and Herzegovina needs to be partitioned sooner rather than later.

Isn't it clear to us then that such plans are being made somewhere far from our attention and consciously released to the public to gauge the final reaction. And the final reaction of every BiH patriot, Bosniak, Serb, and Croat is clear - we will defend Bosnia and Herzegovina. We will not allow you to enslave us, exterminate us, slaughter us…

The fact that the highest officials of the international community react to such messages should be a guide for all pro-Bosnian political parties that something is wrong. That it is dangerously rotten and that the stench and gases of these international plans could suffocate Bosnia and its patriots.

Therefore, it is time to re-examine relations with all Western diplomacies, as well as the OHR. Because, if there is no reaction to the fighter jets and missile systems that Serbia and Croatia are buying, if there is no reaction to Vučić's statement that Tuzla is only a few dozen kilometers in a straight line, then we have the right to suspect a project of killing Bosnia, Bosniaks, Bosnians and Herzegovinians.

Therefore, the right question is not whether Džafer from the beginning of the text made a mistake, the right question is - is he more dangerous than Croatia's combat squadron. Or, is Izetbegović's story about the counted fighters in BiH more dangerous than missile systems and French planes in Serbia.

The answer is clear, just as it is increasingly clear that we have been lied to for too long about Russia's malicious influence in BiH while they were preparing a plan for us to disappear one day. Because, if Russian influence lives anywhere, it lives in Serbia. And the international community, NATO members, are arming that kind of Serbia. So, whose eyes are crossed here and who is deaf?

Furthermore, to whom is Džafer's threat dangerous, and not the statements of HDZ officials from HNK that Bosniak and Serb politicians do not come to Mostar without meeting them. Who is demarcating territory, liar Schmidt?

The OHR for too long, Schmidt now, and increasingly we are realizing the Americans, the British, the Germans are continuously lying to the patriots of Bosnia and Herzegovina about guarantees for its survival, borders, sovereignty. We, gentlemen, have not forgotten 1992 yet, and we will not forget it, we know and we have felt your guarantees.

So now, if you are reading this, consider the following. Saudi Arabia, Iran, Egypt are already in BRICS, Turkey has formally applied for membership. Do not be surprised, gentlemen, if Bosniaks follow the same path with Milorad Dodik. You have been playing with the fate of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the final solution for too long, and now there is a serious alternative!