BiH is not ‘in the biggest crisis since the Dayton’ but in a state of complete aggression

Amina Čorbo – Zećo

Whatever is possible in language is also possible in reality! International law is some sort of taboo in the corrupt West. Since the inception of the SDS, all they have done is crime: there is nothing within the law. The model they apply today is: ‘Marko, don't you plough our roads!

Turks, don't you walk my fields!’ (from the Serb epic poetry Ballads of Marko Kraljević) Many people fear the election results because, if another party wins – they will lose their jobs, said academician Abdulah Sidran as a guest on FACE TV.

Academician Sidran explained the importance of the correct use of terms, and how one word can cause a big problem.

‘There are no guarantors of the Dayton Agreement’, says Bakir Izetbegović. The term ‘constitutive’ does not exist in Dayton, but the term ‘constituent’. The constitutive builds something, and the constituent is an integral part of something’, Sidran said.

In the terrible operation ‘drive them mad’ that has been going on for a long time, we must rightly ask ourselves whether it is correct to say that Bosnia and Herzegovina is in the biggest crisis since the Dayton, which is the most common phrase among both local and foreign politicians and officials.

Security experts should clarify that Bosnia and Herzegovina is in a state of complete aggression by Serbia and Croatia, which are again supported by their internal branches - Milorad Dodik (SNSD) and Dragan Čović (HDZ BiH)!

If the thesis that BiH is in the biggest crisis since Dayton was taken as read, then we could easily conclude that these are exclusively internal problems that will escalate into war! And the attack on BiH has been carried out by the methods of hybrid war for a long time, and the aggressor forces are using a few politicians from the European Union and Russia as world powers.

We have witnessed some ad hoc efforts to divide BiH through attempts to impose the Election Law in the negotiations, which were eventually interrupted, and thanks to the civil parties, and this time with the determination of the SDA not to sign anything!

However, winning a battle does not mean winning a war. For that reason, it is important to call the problems by their real name.

Hybrid war (also known as special war) is a special form of war that is being waged at a time when the aggressor state and the attacked state are usually not officially at war, and it is within that framework that BiH officials must behave and act, because everything else is a battle lost in advance.

The aggressor state usually aims at destabilizing the attacked state, undermining its institutions and destroying government and politics. All the phases in BiH have been already completed, the constitutional order has been attacked by the NSRS, BiH institutions have been blocked, and the overthrow of the government in this phase is not a priority, as it has completely lost its purpose…

Russia is certainly the biggest generator of a hybrid war against BiH.

They are the ones providing various forms of assistance to the governments in Belgrade and Zagreb, and at the same time they lobby and work against Bosnia and Herzegovina in the geopolitical space.

The very same aggressor forces are challenging the role and legitimacy of the OHR and Christian Schmidt, which is one of the proofs that shows the weaknesses not of BiH but of the EU, the UN and international disputes on a higher level.

Serbia and Croatia are acting synchronously against Bosnia and Herzegovina and are now in the phase of creating a perception of radical Muslims, which is supported by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban.

Diplomatically and non-diplomatically, the foundations of Bosnian statehood and its sovereignty are being publicly and secretly attacked, and the responses from BiH are uncoordinated, lukewarm and ineffective in this hybrid war.