Bosnia and Herzegovina is the only country paying its own enemies

It is not unusual, on the contrary, it is a very common phenomenon in the world for states to have external and internal enemies, most often today from the aspect of attacks on economic sovereignty. Just as it is not unusual, on the contrary, it is a very pronounced phenomenon for states to invest huge human and material capacities in the protection of their own society.

In this context, Bosnia and Herzegovina is probably the only country in the world that not only does not fight against the enemies of its statehood, but generously pays these enemies from the public budget, while they, without hesitation, compete to see who can cause greater turmoil in Bosnia and Herzegovina and among its citizens.

Is it not the most obvious hostile action against the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Bosnia and Herzegovina when, for example, the Chairman of the Presidency of BiH, Milorad Dodik, comes to the podium and publicly states that Bosnia and Herzegovina is an impossible country, and that it will collapse, he just cannot confirm whether it will happen during his lifetime, but it will happen in any case. Here are just a few randomly selected statements by Dodik in which he acts hostilely towards his own country: "BiH is not our desire, it is our necessity," Dodik said in Banja Luka, adding that "BiH is an impossible and hopeless country that reduces the chances for the autonomous development of Serbs." "I don't love Bosnia, I love Serbia more," is another Dodik's message that he often repeats. What would happen, for example, if the President of Serbia, Aleksandar Vučić, came out and said that Serbia is a failed state and that it should be divided among its neighbors? How many curses would Patriarch Irinej throw at Vučić before he even got off the stage?

Or, is it not hostile action against the economic stability of Bosnia and Herzegovina when ministers and parliamentarians from the HDZ block the adoption of the law on state property, thereby preventing Bosnia and Herzegovina from reclaiming hundreds of millions of euros worth of real estate in neighboring Croatia, which would also mean a higher standard for BiH citizens.

Or, is it not hostile action against the rule of law in Bosnia and Herzegovina when members of the High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council support the head of BiH judiciary, Milan Tegeltija, after he found himself in a corruption scandal, without even waiting for an official investigation. What if the investigation shows that the media allegations about the corrupt Tegeltija are true? Will the members of the HJPC resign in that case and hand over their well-paid positions to more honorable people?

Or, for example, let's recall when a delegate in the House of Peoples of the BiH Parliament, Mario Karamatić, responded to a journalist's question about whether he pays the RTV fee by saying: "Of course not. Why would I pay it?". Isn't Karamatić's behavior hostile action against the public RTV system of BiH and the right of citizens to have a national television.

One could list statements at length through which political officials in the country act hostilely towards Bosnia and Herzegovina and its citizens, and for which they are generously paid by the same citizens.

Of course, the superficiality and immaturity of the Bosniak political elite should also be considered a form of hostile action towards BiH. Trapped in their own comfort, they have usurped important state functions with incompetent staff, thereby stifling even the slightest possibility for the state to resist the destroyers of its being. Because, the state constitution is not worth even a dried plum if there are no institutions that can ensure respect for the state at its full capacity.